<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651</id><updated>2011-04-21T20:58:04.166-07:00</updated><title type='text'>One Party State</title><subtitle type='html'>Democracy lives from the competition of different opinions. What happens to a democracy if there is no such difference?</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>31</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114590126353558571</id><published>2006-04-24T10:52:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-04-24T10:54:32.563-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Hillary Clinton says barrier ``appropriate'' on parts of borders</title><content type='html'>"A barrier at parts of U.S. borders is 'obviously important' as part of dealing with illegal immigration, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said." - &lt;a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--clinton-immigrati0423apr23,0,3295363.story?coll=ny-region-apnewyork" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And in 2008, people on the left will have to get their gag reflex under control when being told that Hilary is sure better than the Republican candidate. Sure.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114590126353558571?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114590126353558571'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114590126353558571'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/04/hillary-clinton-says-barrier.html' title='Hillary Clinton says barrier ``appropriate&apos;&apos; on parts of borders'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114442058651310718</id><published>2006-04-07T07:35:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-04-07T07:36:26.530-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Guide to Political Scandals under GW Bush</title><content type='html'>1. The President is caught breaking the law.&lt;br /&gt;2. The left-wing blogosphere (aka the left-wing echo chamber) erupts.&lt;br /&gt;3. A second-class White House minion is sent out to explain that the President has the right to break the law because he is the President. That's not what the minion will actually say, but that's what is meant by what s/he says.&lt;br /&gt;4. It's easy to find some legal hack who agrees with the White House, for example the guy who argued that there's no problem with torturing people if they're foreigners.&lt;br /&gt;5. Republicans in Congress agree with the White House and assert that anybody who questions the President during the time of war is a traitor. The right-wing blogosphere (aka the right-wing echo chamber) picks this up, and its major proponents (people who would have made an excellent career in Nazi Germany)  assert that traitors will have to be dealt with.&lt;br /&gt;6. The presumed semi-independent chair of the Senate's Judiciary Committee, Arlen Specter, promises an investigation (where the panel, of course, has a majority of Republicans), which finds that the laws have to be changed so the President doesn't have to break them any longer. Meanwhile, actual constitutional experts are writing very detailed explanations why the President is not allowed to break the law, but nobody cares since American Idol is on, and nobody knows when Brad and Angelina will get married.&lt;br /&gt;7. Democrats hide under their desks - just like in the Seinfeld episode, they have beds installed under their desks, so nobody can find them. Nominally, Democrats are what people in other countries call "the opposition"&lt;br /&gt;8. At this stage, some other case will be reported where the President broke the law&lt;br /&gt;9. go back to 1 and proceed from there&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Optional, somewhere in between:&lt;br /&gt;x. The New York Times writes a lengthy article on page P456, which contains all the fact and which makes it quite clear that the law was broken, that the President must not break the law etc., and that some legal hacks (who nobody takes all that seriously) disagree, all that under the headline "For some, breaking the law is a problem"&lt;br /&gt;y. Maybe a single Democrat Senator (think Russ Feingold) will maybe ask for censure (in theory, breaking the law is an impeachable offense, but since there are elections coming up etc etc etc...).&lt;br /&gt;z. The Army launches operation "Break The Will of the Evildoers" somewhere in the Iraqi desert, which - needless to say - is a huge success, since there weren't any rebels there in the first place. An Army spokesperson exlains that "we must have caught them by surprise since we met very little resistence".&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114442058651310718?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114442058651310718'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114442058651310718'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/04/guide-to-political-scandals-under-gw.html' title='Guide to Political Scandals under GW Bush'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114434019704558209</id><published>2006-04-06T09:15:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-04-06T09:16:37.063-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Libby Says Bush Authorized Leaks</title><content type='html'>"Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff has testified that President Bush authorized him to disclose the contents of a highly classified intelligence assessment to the media to defend the Bush administration's decision to go to war with Iraq, according to papers filed in federal court on Wednesday by Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor in the CIA leak case." - &lt;a href="http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0406nj1.htm" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I just can't wait to see Democrats hiding under their desks again to avoid being asked why they don't support impeachment of a President who breaks the laws left and right.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114434019704558209?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114434019704558209'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114434019704558209'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/04/libby-says-bush-authorized-leaks.html' title='Libby Says Bush Authorized Leaks'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114418187318594689</id><published>2006-04-04T13:14:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-04-04T13:17:53.200-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Institutionalized Corruption: Blackwell reports embarrassing buy of Diebold stock</title><content type='html'>"Columbus [Ohio] - Secretary of State Ken Blackwell made an embarrassing announcement Monday: He &lt;b&gt;accidentally&lt;/b&gt; bought stock in Diebold Inc., a voting machine maker that benefited from decisions made by his office." (&lt;a href="http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/news/1144140003213060.xml&amp;coll=2" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;, my emphasis) Accidentally? Or did the tooth fairy bring the stocks? Maybe the press thinks we're all completely stupid? And why not mention that Blackwell (for his buddy the President) benefitted from Diebold's rigging of voting machines?&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114418187318594689?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114418187318594689'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114418187318594689'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/04/institutionalized-corruption-blackwell.html' title='Institutionalized Corruption: Blackwell reports embarrassing buy of Diebold stock'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114383331206980417</id><published>2006-03-31T11:27:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-31T11:28:32.080-08:00</updated><title type='text'>On Censure, Democrats Wait for Godot</title><content type='html'>"While the discussion of the proposed censure of President Bush has largely focused on the Democrats' hesitance to take a position, today's debate actually reveals failures by Congressional leaders in both political parties. Republicans refuse to investigate their President's misconduct while Democrats keep waiting for Godot, hoping for investigations that will never happen." - &lt;a href="http://www.alternet.org/module/printversion/34277" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114383331206980417?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114383331206980417'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114383331206980417'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/03/on-censure-democrats-wait-for-godot.html' title='On Censure, Democrats Wait for Godot'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114375470952483962</id><published>2006-03-30T13:36:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-30T13:38:29.550-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Institutionalizing Corruption: The Senate's Lobby "Reform"</title><content type='html'>"the Senate passed - by an unsurprisingly huge margin - a bill called the Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act of 2006. The vote was 90-8, which the opposition coming for the most part from senators who felt the legislation did not go far enough (McCain, Obama, Kerry, Feingold, Graham, Coburn). Senators DeMint and Inhofe also voted against final passage." - &lt;a href="http://www.themoderatevoice.com/posts/1143729032.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114375470952483962?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114375470952483962'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114375470952483962'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/03/institutionalizing-corruption-senates.html' title='Institutionalizing Corruption: The Senate&apos;s Lobby &quot;Reform&quot;'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114366185451010176</id><published>2006-03-29T11:49:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-29T11:50:54.530-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Hillary the Hawk</title><content type='html'>"Eager to overcome her reputation as the leader of the party’s left wing, Hillary is 'repositioning' herself, in modern parlance, as a 'centrist,' i.e. a complete opportunist." - &lt;a href="http://www.amconmag.com/2006/2006_03_27/cover.html" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114366185451010176?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114366185451010176'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114366185451010176'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/03/hillary-hawk.html' title='Hillary the Hawk'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114288864541798414</id><published>2006-03-20T13:02:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-20T13:04:05.433-08:00</updated><title type='text'>"Why are you in this party?"</title><content type='html'>"Right on Russ [Feingold], but you know the answer already. You're in a race for the Democratic nomination for President in 2008 where you are the only candidate thus far prepared to say the President is a law breaker and that the war is illegal and should be ended immediately and the Patriot Act repealed. Why are you in this party? You come from a state which eighty years ago saw the bold stand of Robert LaFollette who broke away to form a third party. Why don't you do the same? Look at Jim Jeffords of Vermont. He broke free, defied the Republican whip is now an independent and has more stature in his state than Patrick Leahy." - &lt;a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/cockburn03182006.html" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114288864541798414?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114288864541798414'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114288864541798414'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/03/why-are-you-in-this-party.html' title='&quot;Why are you in this party?&quot;'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114244691816709312</id><published>2006-03-15T10:20:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-15T10:21:58.190-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Institutionalized Corruption: Senators who play the stock market do very, very well</title><content type='html'>"Senators consistently anticipated movements in stock prices: they often purchased stocks just before prices took off like a rocket, and revealed an uncanny ability to sell just when a stock was about to flatten out. [...] 'Nobody gets results like this in the financial world consistently and over the long term,' notes Professor Tom Ferguson, who studies money in politics at the University of Massachusetts-Boston. Any manager of a mutual fund, in fact, who regularly beats the market by as little as two percent annually is considered an investment genius." - &lt;a href="http://www.niemanwatchdog.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=ask_this.view&amp;askthisid=00184" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114244691816709312?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114244691816709312'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114244691816709312'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/03/institutionalized-corruption-senators.html' title='Institutionalized Corruption: Senators who play the stock market do very, very well'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114228716658666123</id><published>2006-03-13T13:57:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-13T13:59:26.596-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The "Straight Talk Express" in action</title><content type='html'>Just listen when self-proclaimed "maverick" and presumed "straight talk" fan John McCain speaks: "straw polls are entertaining, my friends, even extremely early ones. But I think we have bigger things to worry about. So if any friends here are thinking about voting for me, please don’t. Just write in President Bush’s name. For the next three years, with the country at war, he’s our President, and the only one who must have our support today." (&lt;a href="http://politicalwire.com/archives/2006/03/10/quote_of_the_day.html" target="_bank"&gt;source&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114228716658666123?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114228716658666123'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114228716658666123'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/03/straight-talk-express-in-action.html' title='The &quot;Straight Talk Express&quot; in action'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114218023386427519</id><published>2006-03-12T08:12:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-12T08:17:59.716-08:00</updated><title type='text'>One Party Senate Seat in PA Assured</title><content type='html'>"Abortion-rights activist Kate Michelman won't run in Pennsylvania's U.S. Senate race." (&lt;a href="http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/local/states/pennsylvania/counties/philadelphia_county/philadelphia/14071351.htm" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;; "She did the right thing" - &lt;a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/3/12/02631/7245" target="_blank"&gt;"Kos"&lt;/a&gt;, look to what sorry lows the so-called Democratic party has sunk: "as long as Casey is kept off the judiciary committee, he wouldn't be able to do much damage to abortion rights in a Democratic-held Senate." That's just pathetic.) This all but assures there'll be a safe one-party-state seat in the Senate with one rabid right-wing abortion opponent against another rabid right-wong abortion opponent. Let's for example remember that both supported Alito's bid for the Supreme Court seat.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114218023386427519?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114218023386427519'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114218023386427519'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/03/one-party-senate-seat-in-pa-assured.html' title='One Party Senate Seat in PA Assured'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114200460949112989</id><published>2006-03-10T07:28:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-10T07:30:09.506-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Three Stooges</title><content type='html'>"Since assuming their positions, the three of them have shown themselves to be somewhere between useless and disastrous as party leaders. Individually, they lack substance and policy smarts (Pelosi); coherence and force (Reid); and steadiness and mainstream appeal (Dean). Collectively, they convey an image of liberal elitism, disarray, and crabbiness." - &lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2137731/" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114200460949112989?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114200460949112989'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114200460949112989'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/03/three-stooges.html' title='The Three Stooges'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114184048527491915</id><published>2006-03-08T09:10:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-08T09:54:45.286-08:00</updated><title type='text'>When the president broke the law...</title><content type='html'>... his party &lt;a href="http://nytimes.com/2006/03/08/politics/08nsa.html?hp&amp;ex=1141794000&amp;en=7b6645b10226f272&amp;ei=5094&amp;partner=homepage" target="_blank"&gt;simply changed the law&lt;/a&gt;. Of course, there is nothing wrong with changing a law (even though, under normal democratic circumstances, the President's party would have acted like a democratic party and not like a party who basically disrespects the Constitution). The President's breaking of the law in the past is still a crime, and since the President actually even openly admitted he broke the law he has to be impeached. Needless to say, it's unlikely the President's party will go for this, so they need to be asked: Do you still believe the country should be ruled according to the Constitution or not?&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114184048527491915?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114184048527491915'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114184048527491915'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/03/when-president-broke-law_08.html' title='When the president broke the law...'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114183839776421497</id><published>2006-03-08T09:10:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-08T09:19:57.786-08:00</updated><title type='text'>When the president broke the law...</title><content type='html'>... his party &lt;a href="http://nytimes.com/2006/03/08/politics/08nsa.html?hp&amp;ex=1141794000&amp;en=7b6645b10226f272&amp;ei=5094&amp;partner=homepage" target="_blank"&gt;simply changed the law&lt;/a&gt;. Of course, there is nothing wrong with changing a law (even though, under normal democratic circumstances, the President's party would have acted like a democratic party and not like a party who basically disrespects the Constitution). The President's breaking of the law in the past is still a crime, and since the President actually even openly admitted he broke the law he has to be impeached. Needless to say, it's unlikely the President's party will go for this, so they need to be asked: Do you still believe the country should be ruled according to the Constitution or not?&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114183839776421497?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114183839776421497'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114183839776421497'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/03/when-president-broke-law.html' title='When the president broke the law...'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114166011174703386</id><published>2006-03-06T07:45:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-06T07:48:31.746-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Political Kabuki: A Definition</title><content type='html'>Political Kabuki: An extremely stylized political show where the roles of the actors (for example, Senators) are as predefined as the outcome, the result being, even under the most extreme circumstances, only barely (if at all) recognizable as what can be considered reasonable discourse amongst educated men and women interested in the public good.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114166011174703386?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114166011174703386'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114166011174703386'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/03/political-kabuki-definition.html' title='Political Kabuki: A Definition'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114165986143095109</id><published>2006-03-06T07:42:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-06T07:44:21.453-08:00</updated><title type='text'>No integrity please, we're Congress</title><content type='html'>"A Senate committee yesterday rejected a bipartisan proposal to establish an independent office to oversee the enforcement of congressional ethics and lobbying laws, signaling a reluctance in Congress to beef up the enforcement of its rules on lobbying." - &lt;a href="http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/030306M.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114165986143095109?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114165986143095109'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114165986143095109'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/03/no-integrity-please-were-congress.html' title='No integrity please, we&apos;re Congress'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114131833268895597</id><published>2006-03-02T08:49:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-02T08:52:12.700-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Senate Ends Stalemate Over Patriot Act</title><content type='html'>"The renewal of the USA Patriot Act is heading for final passage in the Senate after majority Republicans broke a two-month stalemate over the legislative centerpiece of President Bush's war on terrorism. Overwhelming support for the two-bill package during several initial votes this week virtually assured Senate passage Thursday afternoon. [...] Feingold and his allies complained that the restrictions on government power would be virtually meaningless in practice. Though small, his group of four objectors represented progress for Feingold. In 2001, he cast the lone vote against the original Patriot Act, citing concerns over the new powers it granted the FBI." - &lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060302/ap_on_go_co/patriot_act" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114131833268895597?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114131833268895597'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114131833268895597'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/03/senate-ends-stalemate-over-patriot-act.html' title='Senate Ends Stalemate Over Patriot Act'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114124003204638111</id><published>2006-03-01T11:04:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-01T11:07:12.056-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Institutionalized Corruption: The Democrats' Daddy Warbucks</title><content type='html'>"Sen. Dianne Feinstein's husband, Richard Blum, could well be called the Democrats' Daddy Warbucks. [...] If this were a Republican senator's spouse scoring bundles off the spoils of war and passing it along to fellow Republicans, the liberals would be up in arms. But since Dianne Feinstein is a leading Democrat, mum's the word. Partisanship trumps ethics." - &lt;a href="http://antiwar.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&amp;title=The+Democrats%27%3Cbr+%2F%3E+Daddy+Warbucks&amp;expire=&amp;urlID=17377552&amp;fb=Y&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.antiwar.com%2Ffrank%2F%3Farticleid%3D8618&amp;partnerID=16" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114124003204638111?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114124003204638111'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114124003204638111'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/03/institutionalized-corruption-democrats.html' title='Institutionalized Corruption: The Democrats&apos; Daddy Warbucks'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114123454113557205</id><published>2006-03-01T09:33:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-01T09:36:57.870-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Democrublicans: Joe Lieberman (cont'ed)</title><content type='html'>This just in from Connecticut: "It's been the subject of whispered conversations among top Republican officials for the past month. Now, U.S. Rep. Chris Shays, R-4th District, has let slip the secret: GOP officials have discussed cross-endorsing Democratic Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman this fall." (&lt;a href="http://www.courant.com/news/politics/hc-shays-endorse,0,4829243.story?coll=hc-headlines-home" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114123454113557205?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114123454113557205'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114123454113557205'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/03/democrublicans-joe-lieberman-conted.html' title='Democrublicans: Joe Lieberman (cont&apos;ed)'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114116268046469200</id><published>2006-02-28T13:36:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-28T13:38:00.480-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Institutionalized Corruption: 'Dems cool on Obama bill '</title><content type='html'>"Senate Democrats have declined to support legislation proposed by Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) to reform lobbying, even though he is their point man on the issue." - &lt;a href="http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/022806/news1.html" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114116268046469200?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114116268046469200'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114116268046469200'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/02/institutionalized-corruption-dems-cool.html' title='Institutionalized Corruption: &apos;Dems cool on Obama bill &apos;'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114115356079848422</id><published>2006-02-28T11:05:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-28T11:06:00.810-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The U.S. Disconnect on Bush Abuses</title><content type='html'>"The U.S. news media is experiencing a cognitive meltdown as it tries to hold onto the traditional view of the United States as a beacon for human rights while facing the new reality in which George W. Bush has plunged the nation into the dark arts of torture, assassination and 'disappearances' more common in 'death-squad' states." - &lt;a href="http://www.consortiumnews.com/2006/022806.html" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114115356079848422?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114115356079848422'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114115356079848422'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/02/us-disconnect-on-bush-abuses.html' title='The U.S. Disconnect on Bush Abuses'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114107375602370021</id><published>2006-02-27T12:52:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-27T12:55:56.033-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The case against Democrublican Joe Lieberman</title><content type='html'>"Lieberman's stance on the war is quite troubling. He introduced the Iraq War Resolution to the Senate floor in October 2002, and has continued to unabashedly support every failed Bush administration policy on Iraq ever since. A press luncheon with Lieberman in Baghdad so shocked Time magazine's Baghdad bureau chief Michael Ware that he reported, 'Either Senator Lieberman is so divorced from reality that he's completely lost the plot or he knows he's spinning a line. Because one of my colleagues turned to me in the middle of this lunch and said he's not talking about any country I've ever been to and yet he was talking about Iraq, the very country where we were sitting.' [...] Just this past year, Lieberman voted to confirm John Roberts, and he voted against the filibuster of Samuel Alito LAW '75. He also voted for Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, who, as White House Counsel, called the Geneva Conventions 'quaint' and was responsible for the legal justifications for torture at the Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay prisons. Lieberman's strong ties to industry left him standing alone as a Democrat willing to work on Bush's ultimately failed privatization of Social Security." - &lt;a href="http://www.yaledailynews.com/article.asp?AID=32064" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114107375602370021?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114107375602370021'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114107375602370021'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/02/case-against-democrublican-joe.html' title='The case against Democrublican Joe Lieberman'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114071873391287412</id><published>2006-02-23T10:14:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-23T10:18:53.923-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Democrublicans: Julie Bartling</title><content type='html'>"A contentious abortion bill passed the South Dakota Senate late this afternoon. The vote was 23 to 12. [...] House Bill 1215 would ban most abortions in South Dakota. [...] Democrat Sen. Julie Bartling of Burke said the time is right for the ban on abortion. 'In my opinion, it is the time for this South Dakota Legislature to deal with this issue and protect the rights and lives of unborn children,' she said during the Senate's debate. 'There is a movement across this country of the wishes to save and protect the lives of unborn children.'" - &lt;a href="http://www.argusleader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060222/NEWS/60222020/1001" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114071873391287412?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114071873391287412'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114071873391287412'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/02/democrublicans-julie-bartling.html' title='Democrublicans: Julie Bartling'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114071093463239181</id><published>2006-02-23T08:06:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-23T08:08:54.643-08:00</updated><title type='text'>"All Praise Prof. Alan Dershowitz"</title><content type='html'>"Next week a vastly important book will be published: 'Preemption, A Knife That Cuts Both Ways' by Alan Dershowitz. Yes, that Alan Dershowitz: the very liberal civil libertarian, anti-capital punishment Harvard Law School professor. And but for my lack of his legal scholarship, there is nary a sentence in the book that I - a very conservative editor of The Washington Times and former press secretary to Newt Gingrich - couldn't have written. The premise of his book is that in this age of terror, there is a potential need for such devices as profiling, preventive detention, anticipatory mass inoculation, prior restraint of dangerous speech, targeted extrajudicial executions of terrorists and preemptive military action, including full-scale preventive war." - &lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tony-blankley/all-praise-prof-alan-der_b_16191.html" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114071093463239181?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114071093463239181'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114071093463239181'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/02/all-praise-prof-alan-dershowitz.html' title='&quot;All Praise Prof. Alan Dershowitz&quot;'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114063312723035718</id><published>2006-02-22T10:28:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-22T10:32:07.236-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Port hysteria</title><content type='html'>"At first glance, Dubai Ports World's acquisition of the British-owned Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co. looks troubling: Do we really want a company from the United Arab Emirates, one of the only countries that recognized the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afghanistan, acting as the maritime gatekeeper for New York, Miami, Philadelphia, New Orleans, Baltimore and Newark, N.J.? [...] The problem is that blocking the Dubai deal [...] only provides members of Congress an opportunity to talk tough and pander to the terrorism-rattled xenophobe in us all. [...] Dubai Ports World, like the foreign companies that already run the majority of key U.S. ports [...] is a contractor that coordinates logistics. And most important, it's not in charge of security. Port operators work with U.S. security officials (port police, the Coast Guard, the Department of Homeland Security) in charge of preventing terrorism." - &lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-ports22feb22,0,4937386.story?coll=la-news-comment-editorials" target="_blank"&gt;editorial in the LA Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114063312723035718?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114063312723035718'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114063312723035718'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/02/port-hysteria.html' title='Port hysteria'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114040611249928737</id><published>2006-02-19T19:21:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-19T19:33:32.953-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Democrublicans: Robert Casey</title><content type='html'>Likely Pennsylvanian "Democratic" Senate candidate Robert "Casey, who supports laws banning discrimination based on sexual orientation, said he provides a contrast to the conservative Santorum, the No. 3 Senate Republican who has frequently earned the ire of gay-rights groups for his opposition to gay marriage. [...] Casey also opposes gay marriage but favors allowing same-sex couples to join in civil unions that could provide many of the same benefits as marriage. [...] Like Santorum, however, Casey is opposed to abortion and supported the nominations of John Roberts and Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court." (&lt;a href="http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/13908699.htm" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Let's just remember: Samuel Alito, amongst other things, decided it was perfectly OK to strip-search a ten-year old child. So that's quite the contrast that PA's voters will get to vote on there.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114040611249928737?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114040611249928737'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114040611249928737'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/02/democrublicans-robert-casey.html' title='Democrublicans: Robert Casey'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114040532855590159</id><published>2006-02-19T19:07:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-20T09:33:55.230-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Paul Hackett learns his lesson</title><content type='html'>"Democratic Senate candidate and Marine Corps Major Paul Hackett is accustomed to waging quixotic battles and taking his hits. He just didn’t expect the lowest - and fatal - blows to come from his own party." (&lt;a href="http://motherjones.com/news/update/2006/02/hackett_drops_out.html" target="_blank"&gt;source&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Update from the "Democrat" spin machine: "Former Hackett staffers are now releasing oppo research against Brown for Republicans to use against him and other Ohio Democrats. [...] That was always one of Hackett's biggest liabilities - his inexperienced team." (&lt;a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/2/20/102123/992" target="_blank"&gt;"story"&lt;/a&gt;) - As if it was impossible for Republicans to do their own "oppo" research.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114040532855590159?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114040532855590159'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114040532855590159'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/02/paul-hackett-learns-his-lesson.html' title='Paul Hackett learns his lesson'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114040482321908266</id><published>2006-02-19T19:01:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-19T19:34:06.130-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Democrublicans: Joseph Lieberman</title><content type='html'>"A new Rasmussen Reports poll shows Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-CT) in good shape for re-election [...] If Lieberman runs as a Democrat and is challenged by former Gov. Lowell Weicker running as an independent, Lieberman leads by 21 percentage points, 46% to 25%. If Ned Lamont (D) were to win the Democratic primary and Lieberman to run as an Independent, 'the incumbent Senator still shows a 20-point advantage and leads Lamont 45% to 24%.'" (&lt;a href="http://politicalwire.com/archives/2006/02/17/in_connecticut_lieberman_in_good_shape.html" target="_blank"&gt;source&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why wouldn't he run as a Republican? Would that be too obvious?&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114040482321908266?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114040482321908266'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114040482321908266'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/02/democrublicans-joseph-lieberman.html' title='Democrublicans: Joseph Lieberman'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114021650491249998</id><published>2006-02-17T14:47:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-19T19:34:18.216-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Price Tag: Iraq War</title><content type='html'>"Nobel Laureate Joseph E. Stiglitz and Harvard budget expert Linda Bilmes plan to present this week a paper estimating the cost of the Iraq War at between $1-2 trillion. This is far higher than earlier estimates of $100-200 billion." (&lt;a href="http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2006/1/5/11510/30624" target="_blank"&gt;source&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114021650491249998?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114021650491249998'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114021650491249998'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/02/price-tag-iraq-war.html' title='Price Tag: Iraq War'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114021588461248078</id><published>2006-02-17T14:32:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-19T19:34:29.440-08:00</updated><title type='text'>History Lesson: Climate Out Of Control</title><content type='html'>"The Kyoto Protocol is an international agreement, negotiated in December 1997, by which industrialized nations have committed to making substantial reductions in their emissions of greenhouse gases by 2012. A total of &lt;a class="" href="http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/kyoto_protocol/application/pdf/kpstats.pdf" target="_new"&gt;155 countries&lt;/a&gt; have committed to the agreement thus far. [...] In July 1999, the United States Senate voted 95-0 to pass a resolution co-sponsored by Sen. Byrd (D-W.Va.) and Sen. Hagel (R-Neb.), which stated the Senate would not ratify the Protocol unless rapidly developing countries such as China were included in its requirements to reduce greenhouse gases. The Clinton Administration announced it would not send the treaty to the Senate for ratification." (&lt;a href="http://www.enviroliteracy.org/article.php/278.html" target="_blank"&gt;source&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"A satellite study of the Greenland ice cap shows that it is melting far faster than scientists had feared - twice as much ice is going into the sea as it was five years ago. The implications for rising sea levels - and climate change - could be dramatic." (&lt;a href="http://www.globalecho.org/print_view.php?aid=6624" target="_blank"&gt;source&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114021588461248078?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114021588461248078'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114021588461248078'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/02/history-lesson-climate-out-of-control.html' title='History Lesson: Climate Out Of Control'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22599651.post-114018385424758432</id><published>2006-02-17T05:41:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-19T19:35:05.643-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Renewal of Patriot Act Clears Hurdle in U.S. Senate</title><content type='html'>"Legislation to renew the USA Patriot Act, the anti-terrorism law passed after the Sept. 11 attacks, cleared a key procedural hurdle in the Senate today, easing the way for passage by Congress. [...] The Senate voted 96-3 to limit debate on the measure, allowing the chamber to proceed to a final vote that's scheduled for March 1. Speaker Dennis Hastert said Feb. 10 that the House would pass the legislation if the Senate did." - &lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&amp;sid=a7K0yVORp..I&amp;amp;refer=top_world_news" target="_blank"&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/22599651-114018385424758432?l=one-party-state.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114018385424758432'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22599651/posts/default/114018385424758432'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://one-party-state.blogspot.com/2006/02/renewal-of-patriot-act-clears-hurdle.html' title='Renewal of Patriot Act Clears Hurdle in U.S. Senate'/><author><name>Dante</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05199628858344495327</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry></feed>
